The globalization of strategy research

The field of strategic management emerged and developed in North America before migrating to other parts of the world. Until recently, the relationship between North American strategy research and research elsewhere was asymmetric: North America led, other research communities followed. More recentl...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Autres auteurs : Baum Joel A. C. (Éditeur scientifique), Lampel Joseph (Éditeur scientifique)
Format : Livre
Langue : anglais
Titre complet : The globalization of strategy research / edited by Joel A.C. Baum, Joseph Lampel
Publié : Bingley : Emerald , 2010
Description matérielle : 1 vol (XXXII-444 p.)
Collection : Advances in strategic management ; v.27
Sujets :
LEADER 02871cam a2200361 4500
001 PPN153623950
003 http://www.sudoc.fr/153623950
005 20230126060500.0
010 |a 978-1-8495-0898-8  |b hbk. 
010 |a 1-8495-0898-4  |b hbk. 
035 |a (OCoLC)758546147 
100 |a 20110712d2010 k y0frey0103 ba 
101 0 |a eng 
102 |a GB 
105 |a y a 000|y 
200 0 |a The globalization of strategy research  |b Texte imprimé  |f edited by Joel A.C. Baum, Joseph Lampel 
210 |a Bingley  |c Emerald  |d 2010 
215 |a 1 vol (XXXII-444 p.)  |d 24 cm 
225 2 |a Advances in strategic management  |v v. 27 
320 |a contient des réf. bibliogr. 
330 |a The field of strategic management emerged and developed in North America before migrating to other parts of the world. Until recently, the relationship between North American strategy research and research elsewhere was asymmetric: North America led, other research communities followed. More recently, however, the interaction between North American strategy researchers and those working in other regions has evolved into a conversation. Oftentimes the conversation is collaborative and productive, but occasionally it is adversarial and provocative. While the globalization of strategy research has added considerably to our understanding, it has also brought about greater theoretical and methodological pluralism as formal, rhetorical, discursive, and practice perspectives (among others) emerge and gain traction within the field. For some, pluralism is a phase in the larger cycle of variation and consolidation that characterizes the evolution of strategy research. For others, it is a reflection of fundamentally different socioeconomic conditions and intellectual traditions around the world that is not only likely to persist, but also to give rise to distinctive and potentially irreconcilable schools of thought. Volume 27 of Advances in Strategic Management brings together various emerging perspectives in strategy research for further interaction and debate. By creating a forum for discussing issues at the interface of emerging perspectives and longstanding traditions, we aim to assemble a compendium that contributes to cross-fertilization among them, as well as a catalyst for future research countering the separatist logic that threatens to partition the field 
410 | |0 03970646X  |t Advances in strategic management  |x 0742-3322  |v v.27 
606 |3 PPN028181867  |a Planification stratégique  |2 rameau 
676 |a 658.4012  |v 22 
680 |a HD30.28  |b .G56 2010 
702 1 |3 PPN061490601  |a Baum  |b Joel A. C.  |f 19..-....  |4 340 
702 1 |3 PPN069729751  |a Lampel  |b Joseph  |4 340 
801 3 |a FR  |b Abes  |c 20140321  |g AFNOR 
801 0 |b UKM  |g AACR2 
801 2 |b YDXCP  |g AACR2 
930 |5 441092215:512011311  |b 441092215  |a 02 / 119  |j g 
979 |a IAE 
998 |a 682911